Development of Evaluation Indicators for Integrated Home Care (2025)

Table of Contents

Abstract Purpose Methods Results Conclusion References

Korean J Adult Nurs. 2014 Oct;26(5):543-552. Korean.
Published online Oct 31, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2014.26.5.543

Original Article

Jong Duk Park,¹ and Dukyoo Jung²

Author information

Author notes

- ¹National Health Insurance Service, Seoul, Korea.
- ²Division of Nursing Science, College of Health Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Corresponding author: Jung, Dukyoo. Division of Nursing Science, College of Health Sciences, Ewha Womans University, 52 Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-750, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3277-6693, Fax: +82-2-3277-2875, Email: dyjung@ewha.ac.kr

Received May 12, 2014; Revised October 03, 2014; Accepted October 08, 2014.

Go to:

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to develop integrated evaluation indicators of home care services in the hope that the increasing group of long-term home care patients could receive quality care services.

Methods

The development involves a methodological study on a development phase and a verification phase. The main survey at a verification stage was conducted by the staffs at 146 institutions who agreed to participate on this study.

Results

The evaluation index for the integrated home visit care consisted of five categories and 57 indicators including Managing Institution (12), Environment and Safety (3), Right and Responsibility (7), Process of Care (31) and Results of Care (4). The criterion-related validity was verified in regard to the participation in the 2010 evaluation of long-term home-care institutions by the National Health Insurance Corporation.

Conclusion

The evaluation index of the integrated home visiting care developed in this study is considered suitable to utilize as evaluating indicators in managing and evaluating the way of how institutions integrate and provide home visit care services as well as home nursing care services.

Keywords

Long-term care; Quality assurance; Healthcare; Home care services; Quality indicators

References

1. An HS, Whang IS, Kyung MH, Kim HJ. In: Development of evaluation indicators and weighting for the quality evaluation of long-term care benefits for the elderly. Seoul: Korea University; 2008.
1. Brueggemann J, Becher U, Coners E, Fischer W, Gerber H, Kimmel A, et al. In: 3. Bericht des mds nach 114a abs. 6 sgb XI. qualitaet in der ambulanten und stationaeren pflege. Koeln: Asmuth druck & Crossmedia Gmbh & Co. KG; 2012.
1. Donabedian A. In: The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment in exploration in quality assessment and monitoring. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1980.
1. Fonds Soziales Wien. Qualitaets-handbuch ambulant. Wien: Author; 2008.
1. Im JY, Kim EJ, Choi KW, Park JD, Noh WJ. In: Home nursing services activation plan for long-term care insurance for the elderly. Seoul: National Health Insurance Service; 2011.
1. Kwon JH, Han EJ, Lee JS. In: Improvement of longterm care benefits management with focus on standard benefit model development. Report No.:2009-33. Seoul: National Health Insurance Service; 2009.
1. Lee EO, Im NY, Park HA. In: Research and statistical analysis of nursing and medical care. Seoul: Soomoonsa; 1998.
1. Lee TW, Ko YK, Kim BN, Kim HC, Lee IS, Jung SH, et al. In: Development of clinical performance and clinical indicators of long-term care insurance in South-Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute of Public Finance; 2011.
1. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986;35(6):382–385.
  - PubMed
  - CrossRef
1. MDS & Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung-Spitzenverband. Grundlagen der mdkqualitaetspruefungen in der ambulanten pflege. Koeln: Asmuth druck & Crossmedia Gmbh & Co. KG; 2009.
1. Medizinischer Dienst des Spitzenverbandes Bund der Krankenkassen e V. In: Evaluation der transparenzvereinbarungen. abschlussbericht-quantitative und qualitative auswertung der transparenzergebnisse der medizinischen dienste für die stationäre und ambulante pflege. Essen: Author; 2011.
1. Ministry of Health & Welfare. Law for the evaluation for the long-term care institution. Report No.:2010-39. Seoul: Author; 2010.
1. Ministry of Health & Welfare. The way to achieve a sustainability of long-term care system: 3rd anniversary ceremony and international symposium of long-term care insurance for the elderly. Seoul: Author; 2011a.
1. Ministry of Health & Welfare. Long-term care benefit notification. Report No.:2011-72. Seoul: Author; 2011b.
1. Ministry of Health & Welfare. Law for long-term care insurance for the elderly, enforcement decree of the longterm care insurance for the elderly, enforcement rules of the elderly long-term care insurance for the elderly. Seoul: Author; 2011c.
1. Moon CJ. In: Current guideline and orientation of long-term care insurance for senior citizens in South Korea. 3rd anniversary ceremony & international symposium of long-term care insurance for the elderly. Seoul: National Health Insurance Service; 2011.
1. Mukamel DB, Watson NM, Meng H, Spector WD. Development of a risk-adjusted urinary incontinence outcome measure of quality for nursing homes. Med Care 2003;41(4):467–478.
  - PubMed
1. National Health Insurance Service. Evaluation of long-term home-care institutions 2010. Seoul: Author; 2011.
1. National Health Insurance Service. Long-term care insurance key statistics. National Health Insurance Service statistics. Seoul: Author; 2013.
1. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD reviews of health care quality: Korea-raising standards. OECD publishing. 2012 [doi: 10.1787/9789264173446-en]
1. Shelley SI. In: Research methods in nursing and health. Boston, Little: Brown; 1984.
1. Yoon JL. In: Improvement direction for long-term care system for the elderly-perspective of health care. 2013 Inaugural meeting and commemoration seminar of the Institute of Korean Long-term care: The Korean academy of longterm care. Seoul: National Health Insurance Service; 2013. pp. 72-93.